Demand Side Management, a BlastPoint working artifact

Customer-side load is the only new megawatt you can dispatch this summer.

Data-center growth put every U.S. utility's load forecast back into the red. New generation takes 5-10 years and costs about $1,300 a kilowatt. A targeted Demand Side Management program takes 12 months at a fraction of that.

SECC Snapshot Survey, March 2026 · Lazard LCOE+ June 2025 v18.0 · NERC 2025 LTRA · BlastPoint client outcomes

Pick a profile to see what DSM can shift
850K
4,200

Addressable peak shift

142MW (one-time)

About 5% of your summer peak, at 24% enrollment and a blended 1.0 kW per home. Tune participation and program mix in the Quick Estimate below ("Peak capacity secured").

Avoided peaker cost

$199M (one-time)

The gas peaker you don't build, at ~$1,300/kW, before program cost. The Quick Estimate below nets out 10 years of opex ("Avoided generation capex").

Why this matters now

Your supply pipeline can't keep up with the load forecast.

U.S. peak demand was nearly flat from 2005 to 2022. Hyperscaler buildouts, manufacturing reshoring, and electrification ended that. Every major investor-owned utility has revised its 10-year forecast upward in the last 18 months.

New generation is a 5-to-10 year project. Interconnection queues run longer. In the near term, the megawatts your planners can actually count on live behind customer meters.

+224 GW
Projected U.S. summer peak demand growth, 2026-2035 (NERC 2025 LTRA)
5-10 yr
Time to permit and build new dispatchable generation
< 12 mo
Time to launch a microsegmented DSM program with BlastPoint

U.S. peak demand vs. new generation in queue

Both lines start at 100 in 2024. The widening gap is demand the queue can't meet.

Peak demand Supply in queue
160 140 120 100 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 The gap DSM lives here

Composite of NERC LTRA 2025, EIA Form 860 interconnection queues, and BlastPoint analysis. Indicative.

The math

What a megawatt costs, by source.

Installed cost per kilowatt and levelized cost per megawatt-hour for the resources a planner is choosing between today. DSM is shown as a pooled avoided cost: it isn't generation, it's generation deferred.

Cost to add 100 MW of dispatchable capacity

Lazard LCOE+ June 2025 v18.0 capital-cost midpoints. Solar + storage combines utility PV with a 4-hr battery; nuclear reflects AP1000 estimates. DSM is a BlastPoint-clients-pooled avoided cost.

For every $1 spent on a new combustion turbine, a well-targeted DSM portfolio can secure roughly the same megawatt for the cost printed on the right, and it shows up in months, not years.
~9× cheaper than a new gas peaker

The customers

Consumer interest in demand response is high. Targeting is where it converts.

Harris Poll for the Smart Energy Consumer Collaborative, March 2026, U.S. adults. The aggregate numbers look strong; the per-device willingness varies sharply, which is exactly where segmentation pays.

Net interest in demand response

SECC Snapshot Survey · March 2026 · all U.S. adults

You-take-action programs (peak time rebates)

Customers reduce or shift use themselves on event notification. 34% detractors.

Provider-takes-action programs (smart thermostat, EV)

Utility automatically adjusts a device during events. 47% detractors.

Source: SECC / Harris Poll, "Consumer Understanding of Demand Response," May 2026.

What people will let you control

Share of adults open to demand response who'd let the utility adjust each device

Smart plugs / outlets
66%
Lighting
63%
Water heating
75%
Dishwasher
80%
Clothes washer / dryer
74%
Home cooling
77%
Home heating
74%

SECC, Q2: willing-to-participate net (top-2-box). Not every customer is willing for every device, so segmentation matters.

The Control Keeper effect

The Control Keeper effect: 81% say yes, 41% will share the thermostat.

The phrase comes from a major U.S. utility. It's the customer who endorses demand response in surveys but balks when asked to hand over device control. Behavioral programs (Peak Time Rebates, time-of-use) capture this group without the device handoff. That utility has documented 2,500 customers a year migrating from PTR into the thermostat program once the trust is built.

The implication for outreach: a one-message campaign loses both audiences. Direct load control offers go to households that will opt in; behavioral offers go to the Control Keepers; a migration path connects them.

"2,500 customers per year migrate from Peak Time Rebates to Smart Thermostat. The behavioral program builds the trust that softens the Control Keeper effect."

SECC Webinar · May 2026

A quick estimate

What microsegmented DSM could do for your utility.

Drag the inputs to your service territory's profile for a directional estimate. Per-household kW assumptions (1.2 kW direct load control, 0.8 kW behavioral) are planning benchmarks pending utility-specific validation. Avoided costs from Lazard LCOE+ June 2025 v18.0 ranges.

Your service territory

850K
50K2.0M
4,200MW
200 MW12,000 MW
24%
5% (early launch)40% (mature)
60% direct load control
All behavioral (price signals)All direct load control (thermostats / EV)
$1,300/kW
$800/kW (lower-cost build)$2,400/kW (higher-cost build)

Projected outcome

At full program scale

Avoided generation capex

$238,000,000$238M (one-time, net of 10-yr opex)

One-time avoided capex, net of program operating cost over a 10-year program horizon. Defers about 4% of your summer peak.

Peak capacity secured

170MW

Enrolled households

204K

Direct load control capacity share

102MW

Behavioral capacity share

68MW

Go deeper

Enter your work email to see the full breakdown.

We'll email a copy plus the methodology. Personal addresses aren't accepted.

Assumes ~0.8 kW shiftable per behavioral household and ~1.2 kW per direct-load-control household at typical event dispatch, directional planning benchmarks. The addressable shift is capped at an aggressive 15% of summer peak, a best-case ceiling rather than a typical level. The avoided new-build cost slider is the price the capacity you defer would otherwise cost to build; a new gas peaker runs about $1,300/kW (Lazard LCOE+ v18.0). Avoided cost compounds when peaker plants are deferred rather than built. Full methodology →

This is the back-of-the-envelope version. For a number built from your utility's actual data, run the benchmark below

Want to see your full benchmark? We'll walk through it with you.

Help us make this sharper.

This is a working draft. If something is unclear, wrong, or missing, tell us what would make it more useful.